<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Admits His Plan is Income Redistribution (Marxism)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ponderstorm.com/2008/10/15/obama-admits-his-plan-is-income-redistribution-marxism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ponderstorm.com/2008/10/15/obama-admits-his-plan-is-income-redistribution-marxism/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=obama-admits-his-plan-is-income-redistribution-marxism</link>
	<description>My Brainstorm on Life &#38; Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:46:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spread the Wealth Gone Wild with Barack Obama = Marxism &#38; Bankruptcy &#124; Ponderstorm</title>
		<link>http://www.ponderstorm.com/2008/10/15/obama-admits-his-plan-is-income-redistribution-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Spread the Wealth Gone Wild with Barack Obama = Marxism &#38; Bankruptcy &#124; Ponderstorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ponderstorm.com/?p=97#comment-54</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama Admits His Plan is Income Redistribution (Marxism) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="">
<p>[...] Obama Admits His Plan is Income Redistribution (Marxism) [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Would Barack Obama Like Obama-Style Redistribution of Wealth Applied to Him? &#124; Ponderstorm</title>
		<link>http://www.ponderstorm.com/2008/10/15/obama-admits-his-plan-is-income-redistribution-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Would Barack Obama Like Obama-Style Redistribution of Wealth Applied to Him? &#124; Ponderstorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ponderstorm.com/?p=97#comment-53</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama Admits His Plan is Income Redistribution (Marxism) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="">
<p>[...] Obama Admits His Plan is Income Redistribution (Marxism) [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.ponderstorm.com/2008/10/15/obama-admits-his-plan-is-income-redistribution-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ponderstorm.com/?p=97#comment-51</guid>
		<description>why do all democrats feel the need to use the word &quot;fundamental&quot;?  oh, i know. it&#039;s to make you think they are educated on issues.

i have news for Bodhi up there - you won&#039;t be holding onto your &quot;hard earned money&quot; for very long if Obama is elected President.  the only &quot;change&quot; he is about is the CHANGE in your pocket.

here&#039;s an example of &quot;spreading the wealth around&quot; for you:

a guy passes a bum on the street corner while walking into a restaurant for lunch. the waiter does a great job serving, but has an Obama shirt on to show support for his candidate.  when it&#039;s time to pay the bill, the customer says to the waiter &quot;you did a great job son, but i&#039;m giving your ten dollar tip to the bum outside instead of you.&quot;  when the waiter gets angry at the customer, he is reminded that this is a prime example of Obama&#039;s policy of &quot;spreading the wealth around&quot;.

Taking from the hard-working and giving to the lazy.  Sounds about right, don&#039;t you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why do all democrats feel the need to use the word &#8220;fundamental&#8221;?  oh, i know. it&#8217;s to make you think they are educated on issues.</p>
<p>i have news for Bodhi up there &#8211; you won&#8217;t be holding onto your &#8220;hard earned money&#8221; for very long if Obama is elected President.  the only &#8220;change&#8221; he is about is the CHANGE in your pocket.</p>
<p>here&#8217;s an example of &#8220;spreading the wealth around&#8221; for you:</p>
<p>a guy passes a bum on the street corner while walking into a restaurant for lunch. the waiter does a great job serving, but has an Obama shirt on to show support for his candidate.  when it&#8217;s time to pay the bill, the customer says to the waiter &#8220;you did a great job son, but i&#8217;m giving your ten dollar tip to the bum outside instead of you.&#8221;  when the waiter gets angry at the customer, he is reminded that this is a prime example of Obama&#8217;s policy of &#8220;spreading the wealth around&#8221;.</p>
<p>Taking from the hard-working and giving to the lazy.  Sounds about right, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2001 Radio Interview: Barack Obama Really Wants to Redistribute Wealth &#124; Ponderstorm</title>
		<link>http://www.ponderstorm.com/2008/10/15/obama-admits-his-plan-is-income-redistribution-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>2001 Radio Interview: Barack Obama Really Wants to Redistribute Wealth &#124; Ponderstorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ponderstorm.com/?p=97#comment-52</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama Admits His Plan is Income Redistribution (Marxism) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="">
<p>[...] Obama Admits His Plan is Income Redistribution (Marxism) [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.ponderstorm.com/2008/10/15/obama-admits-his-plan-is-income-redistribution-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 01:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ponderstorm.com/?p=97#comment-50</guid>
		<description>@Bodhi -

Obama says &quot;working Americans&quot; now, but he said he&#039;d cut taxes for 95% of Americans in the past.

Further, his current explanation is that more than a third of &quot;working Americans&quot; pay no income tax, they do pay &quot;payroll taxes&quot;, so he wants to increase the income taxes (even more - the &quot;rich&quot; already pay a much higher percentage) on some hard working people to cover &quot;payroll taxes&quot; (that&#039;s for Social Security and Medicare) for others.

It&#039;s simple, these people are getting an income tax refund for money they never paid.

Obama wants to take an even more excessive amount of money from some people for further encourage a welfare state.

You see, when people are rewarded for not working hard, they are not going to work harder to try and generate wealth.

The wealth is simply shifting, and that&#039;s a recipe for economic disaster.

By the way, I am guessing you like FDR?

Well, you should know that when he signed Social Security into law, he said the program should never become a charity.

Obama is promising to do just that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bodhi -</p>
<p>Obama says &#8220;working Americans&#8221; now, but he said he&#8217;d cut taxes for 95% of Americans in the past.</p>
<p>Further, his current explanation is that more than a third of &#8220;working Americans&#8221; pay no income tax, they do pay &#8220;payroll taxes&#8221;, so he wants to increase the income taxes (even more &#8211; the &#8220;rich&#8221; already pay a much higher percentage) on some hard working people to cover &#8220;payroll taxes&#8221; (that&#8217;s for Social Security and Medicare) for others.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s simple, these people are getting an income tax refund for money they never paid.</p>
<p>Obama wants to take an even more excessive amount of money from some people for further encourage a welfare state.</p>
<p>You see, when people are rewarded for not working hard, they are not going to work harder to try and generate wealth.</p>
<p>The wealth is simply shifting, and that&#8217;s a recipe for economic disaster.</p>
<p>By the way, I am guessing you like FDR?</p>
<p>Well, you should know that when he signed Social Security into law, he said the program should never become a charity.</p>
<p>Obama is promising to do just that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bodhi</title>
		<link>http://www.ponderstorm.com/2008/10/15/obama-admits-his-plan-is-income-redistribution-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Bodhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ponderstorm.com/?p=97#comment-49</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a fundamental flaw in your logic in that you start with a faulty premise. Obama doesn&#039;t promise a tax cut to 95% of Americans -- his site and his statements say that the cuts go to &quot;working Americans.&quot; As the Houston Chronicle says, &quot;If you look only at workers, or &quot;working families,&quot; as Obama likes to put it, it turns out that 95 percent of workers receive a tax cut under Obama&#039;s plans. We looked at that claim on Sept. 18, 2008, and ruled it True. Since then, the Tax Policy Center has published additional research specifically confirming our ruling: They found the Obama plan provided a tax cut for 94.8 percent of workers.&quot;

Obama plans to &quot;spread the wealth around&quot; by allowing more middle-class Americans to hold onto their well-earned money, while taxing rich Americans more heavily. Now you can disagree with the wisdom of that if you like, but it seems fair to me to tax the rich more heavily. Arguably this strategy will lead to a &quot;trickle-up&quot; effect, because ordinary Americans will be able to make more purchases, benefiting all businesses and business owners -- including the rich. certainly trickle-down economics have been an abject failure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a fundamental flaw in your logic in that you start with a faulty premise. Obama doesn&#8217;t promise a tax cut to 95% of Americans &#8212; his site and his statements say that the cuts go to &#8220;working Americans.&#8221; As the Houston Chronicle says, &#8220;If you look only at workers, or &#8220;working families,&#8221; as Obama likes to put it, it turns out that 95 percent of workers receive a tax cut under Obama&#8217;s plans. We looked at that claim on Sept. 18, 2008, and ruled it True. Since then, the Tax Policy Center has published additional research specifically confirming our ruling: They found the Obama plan provided a tax cut for 94.8 percent of workers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Obama plans to &#8220;spread the wealth around&#8221; by allowing more middle-class Americans to hold onto their well-earned money, while taxing rich Americans more heavily. Now you can disagree with the wisdom of that if you like, but it seems fair to me to tax the rich more heavily. Arguably this strategy will lead to a &#8220;trickle-up&#8221; effect, because ordinary Americans will be able to make more purchases, benefiting all businesses and business owners &#8212; including the rich. certainly trickle-down economics have been an abject failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 Reasons Why 'Joe the Plumber' Joe Wurzelbacher Resonates with Americans &#124; Ponderstorm</title>
		<link>http://www.ponderstorm.com/2008/10/15/obama-admits-his-plan-is-income-redistribution-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>5 Reasons Why 'Joe the Plumber' Joe Wurzelbacher Resonates with Americans &#124; Ponderstorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ponderstorm.com/?p=97#comment-48</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama Admits His Plan is Income Redistribution (Marxism) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="">
<p>[...] Obama Admits His Plan is Income Redistribution (Marxism) [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Things I'd Like John McCain to Talk About on the Campaign &#124; Ponderstorm</title>
		<link>http://www.ponderstorm.com/2008/10/15/obama-admits-his-plan-is-income-redistribution-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Things I'd Like John McCain to Talk About on the Campaign &#124; Ponderstorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 05:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ponderstorm.com/?p=97#comment-47</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama Admits His Plan is Income Redistribution (Marxism) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="">
<p>[...] Obama Admits His Plan is Income Redistribution (Marxism) [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.ponderstorm.com/2008/10/15/obama-admits-his-plan-is-income-redistribution-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ponderstorm.com/?p=97#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Obama is more Robbin&#039; Hood than Robinhood.

Robinhood fought against &quot;injustice and tyranny&quot; (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robinhood), so it seems McCain is more like Robinhood - taking money out of the hands of the government and giving it back to the people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is more Robbin&#8217; Hood than Robinhood.</p>
<p>Robinhood fought against &#8220;injustice and tyranny&#8221; (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robinhood" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robinhood</a>), so it seems McCain is more like Robinhood &#8211; taking money out of the hands of the government and giving it back to the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
